« Return of the weblog. D/s or vanilla? &Etc.HomeD/s help & advice »

Oversimplifying sexuality

Amorous Pop Culture

Slate has reviews of a couple of self-help books.

She Comes First: The Thinking Man's Guide to Pleasuring a Woman:

You look up from this book with a weird revised sense of intellectual history. The thought of Karl Marx performing cunnilingus is somehow particularly nauseating. But, as with most self-help literature, the idea is that one somehow joins a rarified coterie by adhering to the principles here. Kerner's aims are not just motivational, they're aspirational—by the logic of syllogism. Aristotle was a great thinker; Aristotle performed cunnilingus; if I perform cunnilingus, I'm a great thinker, too. Or something like that.

Dan Chiasson, The Thinking Man's Guide to Sex

O: The Intimate History of the Orgasm:

It is not a physiological event that attracted Antony to Cleopatra, Edward VIII to Mrs. Simpson, or Prince Charles to a woman who is said to look like a horse rather than "to one of the most desired women in the world," three of Margolis' examples of how orgasm altered the course of history.

Thomas W. Laqueur, A history of the orgasm completely misses the point

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Oversimplifying sexuality. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard