« XXX DebateHomeBloggers vs. Porn »

Could You Be a Fauxdomme?

BDSM

Are you a woman whose husband or boyfriend has expressed a desire for you to dominate him? Do you want to oblige him but don’t feel dominant and certainly would never risk hurting him? Perhaps you could playfully adopt the pose but only in a soft and good-humored way.

Like Suzy:

It’s true I’m not naturally dominant and my knowledge of the lifestyle is quite limited. That’s why I developed Fauxdom. Now I can tease, tickle, torment, kiss, nibble and yes, even spank my lover to my heart’s content without being lectured to by anyone.

Surely you trust science:

In domination tests across the country 4 out of 5 real slaves couldn’t tell the difference between Fauxdom and Femdom.

If you are a loving woman who wants to indulge - within reason your lover’s desire to play slave take a look at:

Suzywearsthepants ~ The Goddess of Fauxdom

Tom Allen amplifies:

And just as importantly, slaves, would-be slaves, groveling worms, pets, and ambulatory washbasins who have not been able to keep their thoughts focused properly can now learn the ancient art of “fauxmissiveness.” Like Fauxdomination, fauxmissiveness is 1/3 easier to practice, and 42% faster to learn.

No longer will a Domme have to weigh the consequences of allowing a submissive to think for himself. Likewise, submissives will no longer have to wonder if they are being selfish when they complain of work pressure, chest pain, or missing appendages.

A smart Fauxdomme will begin training her pet as a fauxmissive without delay. Unless it’s really inconvenient right now. But later is good, too.

Fauxdommes & Fauxmissives

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Could You Be a Fauxdomme?. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard