Amorous Propensities : sex is funny, sex is sad

I believe that some people take it too far. I believe that we are equal races but some intelligent men out there realize how hard a woman works in todays society and desires to show the gratefulness they have. I treat men equal unless they choose to give up power to Me.

Sincerely Miss Wendy

Gynarchy as fantasy or for role-playing can be fun. But pretending it is valid socially or politically is just plain stupid.

no one is superior to anyone else although character traits are superior. things like honesty, love, truth, justice, morality, kindness, concern, etc…

things that make a superior person are superior not gender or role…

cuz lets face it… people grow, change & eventually get better.

Having been dismissed by my last Domme for failure to accept the gynarchic party line {I posted the following at her silly little SmartGroup, from which I was subsequently booted: “i view my participation in FemDom in terms of a 1-on-1 personal relationship. i believe that D/s is indeed a two-way street; i have legitimate wants and needs and it is my right to seek and assure my own personal satisfaction. i’m utterly turned off by what i perceive as an extreme trend in the concept of FemDom by many of its adherents, both Female and male. i think that gender supremacism is no better than racism, with which it shares a panoply of virtually identical characteristics. i recognize that these views will be quite unpopular among many here. So be it.”

Reading the personals at FemDom sites has become a really depressing experience lately. It’s bad enough that there are hundreds of male subs for every dominant woman, but worse still is that there are hundreds of greedy, humorless, or just plain sick Dommes for every humane one.

Many of the “Dominas” that you see online now are in it only to make a buck.

Their whole personality is just a manufactured charade they’ve created hoping to do some financial domination over the web.

They shouldn’t be confused with the many fine dominant women who are out there nor with honest ProDommes who provide a valuable service.

And any woman who is foolish enough to fall for Elise Sutton’s matriarchal nonsense isn’t any sort of Goddess.

The concept of Female Superiority covers a WIDE variety of opinions and beliefs. Such a wide variety in fact, there is something for nearly everyone to find to disagree with.

Take out the word “Superiority” which is slightly emotionally charged, take out the vision of skinheads and nazi’s that the word connotates, as a matter of fact, take out all of the negative connotations that many tend to place upon the phrasing.

What are you left with? Simply the belief that women are superior to men. Period. Not that men should be oppressed, herded into camps and done away with, that they are “less human”, or that they should be discriminated against.

As a Female Supremist Myself… I simply believe that the nurturing tendencies of the females are superior to the aggressive natures of males. Is this an oversimplification? OF COURSE! But space is limited, so we’ll let it slide. There are a multitude of other reasons for My beliefs, NONE of which include (by the very nature of My belief in the INTELLIGENT, NURTURING qualities of women) narrow minded discrimination or biased hatred.

Of course there are intelligent, kind, considerate males. It is ridiculous to say otherwise.

Of course there are those who take the concept of Female Superiority too far, turning it into a cartoon sham. Human nature is human nature, and women as well as men fall subject to its influences.

Of course it is a complex issue too detailed to cover in a quick posting.

OF COURSE, for goodness sakes, it is a matter of personal opinion and not (as people are wont to do with their beliefs in any arena) to be shoved down people’s throats with sanctimonious vigor.

And of course, it is controversial, being outside of the conditioned social norms of belief.

Just a few thoughts,

Miss Sue

p.s. as to the number of self-serving, insincere domme-lets who are only “in it for the money”? #1 Stop feeding them and they will simply vanish, silly boys. The insistence that they thrive as though independent from stupid, hormone driven male impulses who actually PAY these girls is plain silly. If they are here for the money? Dont give it to them and they will go away DUH. LMAO. #2 Make informed choices about ALL of your online interactions. This will help with the piece of advice up above. Take a little self-responsiblity for a change. Yes, the dynamic of the D/S relationship is skewed as far as power and decision making goes, SO MAKE RATIONAL DECISIONS BEFORE YOU enter into the relationship. Much easier, if NOTHING else, to do this than to try to recover from the damage than an ill-chosen relationship can do. (Damage being fairly serious, from non-consensual blackmail and financial damage WAY outside the bounds of a CCS Relationship, to physical damage from a domme-let who tries to direct you in a little S/m play, to the ego-shattering discovery you have been serving a male or simply NOT who you thought you were serving. All BAD things. All things that cheapen the BDSM lifestyle. All things that you can easily AVOID by making rational decisions about WHO you enter into a D/s relationship with.

LOL Of course, I do not expect this advice to be heeded. Silly boys will fall for a faked picture and a not-so-clever mentality that they think they can subtly top-from-the-bottom. They’ll fall for it again and again and again. And blame Dommes. shrugs It is what it is.

Carry on.

*SSC, not CCS (My fingers got ahead of Me in My ranting lol)

I was thinking that CCS must be a fetish I’d never heard of (hard to imagine but I’m sure there are a few).

For me the notion that women are more ‘nurturing’ is very much within contemporary social norms. The John Gray image of heterosexuality. And the basis of many a sitcom sketch.

Since my own relationship includes F/m play I’m not uncomfortable with Woman Worship.

My only brief against notions of female superiority is when it is taken outside of individual relationships. There’s a popular female supremacist who consistently advices men to stay in genuinely bad marriages no matter how much the woman abuses and takes advantage of them.

For me this is as bad as the old Christian admonition for women to submit themselves to their husbands as a moral duty. Or the Catholic Church stand against divorce.

And trying to push Femdom as a political manifesto is just plain sad. Likewise trying to ‘prove’ the notion with lots of bad pop sociological generalizing.

But of course with the right partner personal surrender can be quite liberating and joyous.

The concept of women as more sensitive, more intelligent, more competent and (especially) as more nurturing and compassionate is an unfounded generalisation, grossly inaccurate and grossly offensive to men as a sex.

It’s also the absolute orthodoxy of modern western societies, as any look at a typical sitcom or a few tv ads will show.

There’s an unspoken trade-off at the moment. Men are tacitly allowed to control the political power and money of the western world, in return for a tacit admission that they’re less worthy (or at least less moral) beings than women.

In this scenario, in which men hog the power and money, and women hog the social respect, everyone is a loser.

I thought the notion was used to put the sub into subspace.

One does not need to be a rocket scientist to see that the concept is not viable as a structural model for society.

Of course the idea follows quite nicely within the general zeitgeist of misandry.

But, this too, will pass eventually.

All women are dominate at least a few days of the month. My exwife, never, could be considered a sub, she was definately the take charge type. I remember a dom dude in dallas, he about saw my not so sub side, when he thought he’ld try to make her be his sub, lol. She wouldve pulverised those lil…

I am a firm believer that social conditioning far outweighs any innate mental dissilimarities that a difference of gender creates.

The person that I share more blood with than anyone else, is my brother. Yet, he was never picked on as the younger one due to normal sibling rivalry, he never became shy, he made lots of friends, he became a much different person than I. We could not possibly share more genes unless we were identical twins, yet because he had different interactions in society than I, we’re very different.

ahem just an example, and not a unique one I’m sure.

Women are absolutely superior to men. Every man knows it deep down, and more and more women are coming to realize their innate power and harness it. Simply put: without all that testosterone coursing through their veins and screwing up their every thought process, women are inherently more rational and better suited to being in command.

Women do have testosterone.

And estrogen certainly affects mood and emotion.

Don’t you think it would be more fun to surrender to a woman because you lover her than you think she should be appointed dictator?

Oh dear!

One or two men here just a tad horny while the rest come across as sane.

If I called myself a “white supremacist”…but a CARING, NURTURING one…then does that get me off the hook from being a racist?lol

Quite frankly I’m thankful that we see more and more women coming forth with this insanity so that it can help prove that it’s not just some members of the male gender who are psychopaths.

Don’t get me wrong as I also practice BDSM and what power exchange really means but I hardly see it as a way for me to put forth some sort of fascist socio-political agenda.

It seems being a male supremacist is wrong because as soon as you here that term then it must imply testosterone poisoning or some feminist rubbish but apparently it’s okay for one to believe in the NURTURING and CARING nature of female fascism.

Tut-tut!

One form af fascism is as good as any other no matter how much you sugar-coat it with feeling horny.

There is a site that that exists that promotes something called “Matriarchal Socialism” but again it doesn’t matter how much you sugar-coat it with fancy terminology intelligent people will see behind the facade and actually see nothing more than fascism…at least now I’m thankful for the fact we have opportunities for people to see for sure nowadays the folly of male chivalry and now we can actually stop apologizing for some women’s flaws and instead hold them responsinble AND accountable for those individuals responsible!!!

PEACE IN OUR TIMES, PLEASE!

Fascism is fascism, no matter what fancy name it resides with…female supremacy, male supremacy, white supremacy, black supremacy, Matriarchal Socialism, Patriarchal Socialism, Alien Socialism, beef jerky socialism…yawn…I’m getting bored of mindless idiots!

Enough of the insanity.

Axeman.

Women are winning to such an extent that the gender wars are over. They’ve won! Get used to it!

There is a certain thing, and it is this: a majority of men and women BELIEVE that women are more nurturing and compassionate, because, a majority of women BEHAVE as such! Fewer men BEHAVE this way, well, because it isn’t beneficial in the current stages of our society to BEHAVE that way, or at least, a majority of men BELIEVE that. Neither men, nor women, successfully climb the corporate ladder by turning the other cheek, or compassionately standing aside and allowing the more aggressive headway. It doesn’t serve well in the military arena either. The wealthy and successful of the world, for the most part, get there by standing out as the more qualified, more dedicated, more fearless, more willing to ignore / eliminate others who get in their way! Look at the successful women of the world. Oprah, Rice, Clinton, etc…

They didn’t get to where they are at, I assure you, by being nurturing or compassionate. On the contrary, they sit on their celebrity, and their fortune, and their idolism, because they played the “success game” in accordance to it’s time-tested pathway there.

I don’t truly think it’s an issue of a sexist nature. I think, rather, that humanity as a species, as we continue to evolve and break away from “physical strength” being a necessity in the aggressive environment of human success, we are witnessing the inevitable “awakening” of a woman to display her own aggressive, conquerring, competitive, and most importantly, present-from-birth, tendencies!

To rule, lead, or in any other term, be responsible for making decisions for others, you have to convince others that you are worthy and/or better suited to the task. How does one get there?

In the lesser animals of the planet, the “alpha” position is often determined by remaining the victor of numerous challanges for the position. This of course requires aggression.

For us humans, it’s really no different. You will be challanged for leadership, continously in life, regardless of sex. Of course, there are those of us who for whatever reason, don’t desire to be the “leader” and are content being followers, but make no mistake. To run a country, a business, a shop, a section, requires leadership qualities, abilities, and attributes, not JUST the text book stuff they teach you in LEADERSHIP 101, but most IMPORTANTLY, the very biological fabric of Instinctual leadership traits.

As far as bdsm, well, kink is kink, and best not to be confused with Survival of the fittest.

Just my humble opinion.

kat.

Females do live longer as a general rule. However, in terms of intelligence I don’t beleive either gender can lay claims to being more intelligent or superior in the brains department. Its ture that more women than men are graduating from college today. This may be attributable to the fact that their are higher paying jobs for males in professions, that do not require a college degree. Examples are plumbers, electricians and etc.

Susan B Anthony once said, ‘give us sufferage, and we’ll give you socialism”. socialism never came, at least how she saw. in fact, feminism beleived that the empowerment of women would lead to the end of poverty, oppression, and war. fat chance - women share the same ambitions as men, so much so that if they are denied those ambitions because of their sex they will seek them through their spouses. nietzsche, the great misogynist, argued that women lose their greatest power by insisting that they have the same power. in my relationship, my girl seems to set the big picture goals. many femdom sites advocate this: let the man have input, but the female is best suited to have the final say. but what if my girl were a spendthrift, a fool, or impulsive? what if she didn’t know alot about a subject - say er rights under law or the structural integrety of a house? shouldn’t she yeild to the person with the knowlege to make a better choice?

and so it is with governance. it matters not whether it is men or women who lead us because human ambition has never depended on sex (only the manifestation of that ambition),it only matter that those who are in the position to make the best decision get to make it, from whatever position they’re in.

I agree with Roger.Let whoever is best at a subject be in charge of that subject,that’s teamwork.Everybody is slightly different.Most women in a relationship like to be the bottom,who can blame them.The top has all the responsibility but we should all be able to enjoy ourselves so give in to each other more,look after and defend each other against officialdom,make it work.

I find astrology quite useful at sorting all this out. Some ‘people’ are more dominant, with a stronger mars or whatever, than others. Others like me, with lots of stuff in subby little pisces know in their hearts that their partner is way better at being in charge of the big things in life so I just try not to get too egoistic. But it certainly isnt much to do with whether males or females are ‘better’. We are none of us much different really, its just a reorganisation of genitalia and the rest is social conditioning. Surely a lot of the prodommes are ‘working women’ who woke up to the fact that they dont need to let men excrete fluids all over them any more. I dont think they believe in female suprmacy any further than the next ‘tribute’. Bah! So much is just bollocks! Shakti and Shiva - we are all gods! Lets just keep learning how to behave like them!

Female supremacy is just stupid.It is prostitution without feeling.To indulge in it with a domme the bottom has to be successful in life,at least moneywise.Since it is always the female who gets paid,she is only performing a service that a successful male requires .How can she be regarded as superior?.I agree with Roger,if you are lucky enough to find ,in your life a woman to love and whom you can actually communicate with ,employ the old adage”horses for courses”,both do what you are best at.It should be a man and woman against the rest of the world,unfortunately some of these so called financial dommes do not realise the damage they do to relationships,they see male weakness for women as something to be exploited.

There are some scandalous money “dommes.” But that is just part of the phone sex business. The do the female superiority because men will pay for it.

There are also plenty of gynosupremacists who aren’t ProDommes their faith shapes their relationships with boyfriends and husbands.

I don’t think that El… Su… promotes a ‘loving’ lifestyle for both sexes.

As a steady reader of her website for n years, she’s only focused on the women’s part of love. She says she’s a professionnal psychologist on male psyche. OK, but for the rest…

For example, in a very old post, she severely blamed a poor young man because he was complaining about his girl friend (mistress) who refused him to return back to the university. Just because of his past acceptance, she thinks it was a betrayal attitude.

Female supremacy, domination, superiority ? Perhaps (!), but for today, I can definitely say that’s not ‘loving’.

And sorry for my bad english.