« Give women easier access to pornHomeAmerica's schizoid attitude to sex »

Bailey's topic of gay femininity also has attracted criticism

Gender Outsiders: Transgendered & Others

From a review of The Man Who Would Be Queen

.
Bailey asserts in his book that there are two types of male-to-female transsexuals -- highly feminine gay men and men who are neither gay nor feminine. Members of this second group, known as autogynepheliacs, change sexes because they are aroused by the idea of themselves as women, Bailey said. The rationale behind the second type of transsexual, as well as Bailey's desire to place all transsexuals into one of the two categories, has led to heated debate. Lynn Conway, a male-to-female transsexual and former engineering professor at the University of Michigan, said Bailey's conclusions are both false and offensive.

Bailey tackles sensitive transsexuality issues; some find his views offensive

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Bailey's topic of gay femininity also has attracted criticism. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard