« 20% to 30% of men suffer from premature ejaculationHomeAmerican women vs. the rest of the world »

Adonis from Chernitz

Heterogeneous

The discovery of that ancient statue and other prehistoric erotic objects fires a running academic debate about the sexuality of our earliest ancestors. Were they as uninhibited as kinksters at a play party or as prudish at the folks who attend your neighborhood Baptist Church?

But how should researchers interpret these recent finds? The discoveries have reopened an old rift in the academic world, in which two camps are at odds over a fundamental issue. The question they're quarreling over is this: Did our ancestors live relaxed and uninhibited lives, or was asceticism the order of the day in the primeval age?

The two sides of the debate are clearly defined: Socio-biologists believe that the early hominids were basically promiscuous, and that they spent their lives running around the fields and woods of their day, constantly in pursuit of sex, following the genetic dictates of their rampant hormones. The other side of the equation are those -- sometimes referred to as "tabooists" -- who assume that even early man lived under a strict system of sexual abstinence, and that the sex lives of Neanderthal man were everything but orgiastic.

Pornography in Clay

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Adonis from Chernitz. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard