« Cures for Semen AllergyHomeTen Reasons to Like Kink »

Search Engine Porn Filters

Laws and Politicians, Mostly Bad

The American Civil Liberties Union takes a stand agains the American Justice Department’s attempt to bring back the Child Online Protection Act that the US Supreme Court ruled a violation of free speech rights.

The ACLU says the anti-porn filters protect people using the major search engines.

The study concludes that the strictest filter tested, AOL’s Mature Teen, blocked 91 percent of the sexually explicit Web sites in indexes maintained by Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp.’s MSN.

Filters with less restrictive settings blocked at least 40 percent of sexually explicit sites, according to the study of random Web sites by Philip B. Stark, a statistics professor at University of California, Berkeley.

“Filters are more than 90 percent effective, according to Stark,” ACLU attorney Chris Hansen said Tuesday during a break in the trial. “Also, with filters, it’s up to the parents how to use it, whereas COPA requires a one-solution-fits-all (approach).”

Government study: Web 1 percent porn

Will American parents ever take responsibility for their children?

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Search Engine Porn Filters. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard