Are straight people better at BDSM?
• BDSM , • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual , • Richard Evans Lee
(A reply to an email grows into an entry. Lately I've become tried of just quoting and mocking. An entry morein the manner I use in Pansexual Sodomite. If you find any of the following disturbing just go away.)
Being in control is a talent and a learned skill. With any sex you have to have the back of your mind set on the response of the guy that you are with: did he like having his neck nibbled, did your tongue shove too forcefully? It is a trickier balance to both be in charge and make sure everything is working for both of you.
Too many man think their mere desire to be on top is all that it takes to make it work. The first night I had a young guy on his knees it probably worked because of his hunger, rather than my knowing what I was doing. My one time on bottom with a guy was simply annoying: he didn't know what he was doing. The time with a woman was great but she was very experienced.
Sometimes I fear that heterosexual people get this right more often than gay folk. But my sample is biased. I suspect I'd have met cannier gay men involved in S&M if I'd been more open to it when I lived in San Francisco.
The straight BDSM lifestylers I've known around here seem to have a clear understanding that negotiation is an essential predecessor to a 'scene.' Recapitulating what I said above the gay sadists around here seem to all but retreat into Tarzan-talk: "Me Master, you slave. You do what I want and shut up!" That makes sense on the other side of the collar but should never rule out sane discussion before rendering a guy helpless. Given the dynamic before ever meeting. To be fair the gay men who wanted to be slaves seemed mighty petulant and demanding about what I might do to them.
Admittedly my one time with a Domme was atypical. I hadn't approached her as a submissive. She started chatting with me because she'd enjoyed things I'd written. We wound up talking about all manner of things, few of which had anything to do with sexuality or power exchange.
Naively perhaps when she dropped by my house for a visit I just thought we'd sit and talk. And we did. Then she asked me if I'd like to realize one of my fantasies. Now, who would I have been to say no?
One thing I think is illustrative of the differences between my two times on the bottom: where to strike. When it proved that the guy didn't know enough to not strike a kidney with a riding crop what passed through me wasn't erotic pain but "what an incompetent." The woman knew which places would cause greater sting but no risk. The former left me with a irritated doubt that I'd take the same chance again. The latter with a powerful erotic afterglow that lasted a couple of days.

Comments
Posted by: Mithras | April 9, 2004 07:29 PM
Posted by: Richard | April 10, 2004 06:04 AM
Posted by: Mithras | April 10, 2004 10:47 AM
Posted by: Mistress Matisse | April 10, 2004 03:45 PM
Posted by: Richard | April 10, 2004 04:41 PM
Posted by: Richard | April 10, 2004 05:08 PM