« American marriage isn't biblicalHomeAdelphopoiesis: gay marriage? »

S&M: civil-liberty issue?

BDSM , • Sex Workers

Two stories on Philly.com about the arrrest of a Philadelphia ProDomme who works under the name Madame Suzanne Devereaux.

"BDSM [bondage/discipline/sadomasochism] is one part performance art, one part psychotherapy and one part erotica - and that doesn't mean sex," said Nelson, who uses the name "Madame Suzanne Devereaux" in her work. "There's never any type of sex, no handjobs, no blowjobs. I do nothing to make my clients climax. That's not part of the session."

Dominatrix: I'll whip courts over sex rap

Pettifogging, sex isn't always a matter of genital contact. But I do wish her luck.

Followers of sadomasochism are "believe it or not, often high-powered executives, very authoritative males who get a high out of relinquishing control," said Chris Fariello, senior staff therapist at the Penn Council for Relationships in Philadelphia. "They get turned on sexually by being submissive to the dominatrix, and then may go home and have sex with their wives, or other people, or by themselves. Or they may find the sadomasochism sexually gratifying by itself."

S&M fans gain pleasure from pain

"Followers" - ? - makes BDSM sound like a religion.

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about S&M: civil-liberty issue?. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard